<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/32">
<title>ELI Conference</title>
<link>http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/32</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/59"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/58"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/57"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/56"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2025-02-23T23:12:52Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/59">
<title>Prejudicial to Public Order: Legal Issues on Banning Book in Malaysia</title>
<link>http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/59</link>
<description>Prejudicial to Public Order: Legal Issues on Banning Book in Malaysia
Mohd Zahir, Mohd Zamre; Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam; Khalidah Dahlan, Nur; Mohammed Na’aim, Mohd Safri; Hashim, Hasnizam; Mahdi Althabhawi, Nabeel
In some jurisdictions, a government is allowed to ban any book that is seen as not suitable or improper for the country. Banning books is said to occur if individuals, public officials, or organisations remove books from libraries, school reading lists, or bookstore shelves because they disagree with their content, ideas, or themes. In this context, those who support a ban generally claim that the book in question contains graphic violence, attacks parents and family, is sexually explicit, exalts evil, is unworthy of literary merit, is inappropriate for a certain age range, or uses offensive language. As a result, this article aims to explore the legal implications of banning books in Malaysia. This article uses a qualitative research approach by analysing both primary and secondary data. This article found that under the Printing Presses and Publications Act of 1984, the Malaysian government has prohibited the publication of various books. Section 7 (1) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 is invoked to ban an undesirable publication in Malaysia. Under these provisions, a book could only be prohibited by order of the minister published in a gazette when the book is “prejudicial to public order.” However, this article found that the term “prejudicial to public order” is debatable as it can be interpreted differently. Therefore, this article suggests that the term “prejudicial to public order” under Section 7 (1) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 must be defined in the statute to prevent misinterpretation of the law.
</description>
<dc:date>2024-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/58">
<title>Responsibility for missing the opportunity to get married (Comparative analytical study Between Law and Islamic Fiqh)</title>
<link>http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/58</link>
<description>Responsibility for missing the opportunity to get married (Comparative analytical study Between Law and Islamic Fiqh)
Hamad Smael, Tahsin; Hassan Omer, Omer
The subject of missing the opportunity is one of the topics that raised a deep jurisprudential controversy, provoked discussion, where it is assumed from the missed opportunity that the victim was seeking to achieve a common benefit between him and his partner in marriage, and was counting on an opportunity to make what he dreams of a reality if things go on their natural course, but the defendant by his mistake squanders this opportunity and deprives him of it, so the study seeks to show the extent to which it is possible to make the missed opportunity a basis for responsibility and compensation for the damage that the right The victim is affected by the loss of the opportunity to marry him, and to indicate the lack and defect in both the Iraqi Civil Code in force and the Iraqi Personal Status Law, and compare them with Islamic jurisprudence, and then propose appropriate solutions to the deficiency and defect found of them.
</description>
<dc:date>2024-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/57">
<title>The legal system for the presumed basis of crimes of infringement of electronic intellectual property: Comparative analytical study</title>
<link>http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/57</link>
<description>The legal system for the presumed basis of crimes of infringement of electronic intellectual property: Comparative analytical study
Hassan Marhi, Muhammad
Scientific works are no longer a right determined for the personal interests of the author alone. Rather, they are of interest to society as a whole, and in light of the electronic revolution that has made scientific innovation easier to do, more widespread, and broader in impact, especially since authorship, production, and mental innovation are characterized by the fact that they do not bear fruit except through dissemination and dissemination. Its spread and expansion produced more effects, which required providing a greater degree of protection for this mental product. Thus, violating this intellectual property became an aggression against a part of the human personality and harming public resources or common sources of culture. It is considered a crime according to some laws, consisting of elements that represent its truth and require a special element. Presumably for this crime, which pollutes the intellectual and spiritual heritage of the national society in particular and human society in general, given that intellectual works, from the moment they are published, become the property of all in terms of benefit and benefit, with full acknowledgment of their product and the mental source of the person of their author, and on this basis, it is permissible to infringe upon the intellectual impact
</description>
<dc:date>2024-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/56">
<title>The Justice Sector and Digital Transformation A study in the light of Algerian legislation</title>
<link>http://192.64.112.23:8080/xmlui/handle/311/56</link>
<description>The Justice Sector and Digital Transformation A study in the light of Algerian legislation
Amina, Ghana
Some countries have begun to introduce modern technological means into the justice system, as part of what is known as e-government. The digitization of justice has become the most visible manifestation of the evolution of judicial work. This strategy has spread to the rest of the world, and countries' progress is now measured by the extent to which digitization is widespread throughout their institutions. However, the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic were an unprecedented turning point in the justice sector. Digitization has become an unavoidable option that must be applied to all judicial bodies. All countries have rushed to find modern mechanisms for delivering judicial services, with the aim of ensuring the efficiency and transparency of justice. Several laws have been enacted to keep pace with this evolution. Algeria is one of a number of countries to have adopted legislation aimed at making the transition from traditional trials to electronic trials. However, this digital transformation, while potentially revolutionizing justice, can be both positive and dangerous, particularly in view of the emergence of artificial intelligence technologies
</description>
<dc:date>2024-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
